Twenty Top Tips for Academic Writing
"Who is that judge that sits perpetually in your head?"

Why I'm a convert to writing with Scrivener

All I actually need to write a novel is a stack of identical A4 notebooks (makes keeping the wordcount easier), a good biro (fat enough not to get RSI), and a plotting grid. Oh, and piles and piles of scrap paper for all the notes and ideas and snaglists. A word processor is essential next, but the many "novel-writing" programs on the market seemed to be little more than toys dreamed up by non-writing geeks, to sell or give away to beginners writers desperate for ways to make the weird business of creating something out of nothing more manageable.

But Scrivener is different, and though I'm neither a techno-phobe nor a geek, I'm now a complete convert. It was born apparently from the different but not unrelated challenges of writing a PhD and a novel, and inspired by Hilary Mantel's description of how she works, and that pedigree shows. It's the only such program which I know is used by slews of other professionals for writing fiction, creative non-fiction and the more factual and technical kind of non-fiction, and I see exactly why.

It's available for Windows and Mac, with iOS available too, and a Linux version in the works. But, like any powerful, flexible program, it gets a bit of getting used to. So I'm going explain how it works as a way of explaining why I think it's worth sticking at, and some ways of getting to know it. I haven't used everything it does, but this is how it's looking to me so far.

First, the essence of Scrivener is that the basic unit is a "document", which is just like any word-processing document. A document could be one word, one "beat", one scene, one chapter, or a whole novel. The big difference is that Scrivener will display your documents seamlessly, in "Scrivenings" mode, one after another so you can read them as a single document with the join between marked or not, as you choose. You can work on a whole chapter, say, while also being able to handle or move the individual scenes separately if you want to.

Second, each document has a set of associated meta-data, which it always carries with it, but you don't have to see if you don't want to. The standard meta-data includes what's on the famous "index cards": a name for the document, and a synopsis of what it contains, and as much or as little as you like of colour-coding (for, say, the setting of each scene, or the point-of-view) and stamping (marking, say, whether a document is a rough-cut or a final draft).

You can also have custom metadata: I'll often use that to track things which get in a horrible muddle so easily, such as the date or time of the scene, or the ages of the main character. Attached to the document is also other data: your editorial comments like balloons in Word, footnotes, references, images, keywords, notes on the document, notes on the project, a list of any "snapshots" you've taken before you embarked on some revisions.

Third, there are three main ways to see any "project":

  1. as a document or seamless run of documents, looking like any other word-processor, with as much or as little of the meta-data, and outliner detail as suits you. You can work on a "full screen", where you see nothing but this blank page, and just type.
  2. as the famous "cork-board" where you can brood over your index cards, each with its synopsis, stack them in hierarchies, rearrange them. You can colour-code them for different characters or points-of-view,  settings or timelines. You can mark their status - drafted, finished and so on. I even have index cards for important things which are happening off-stage, just as I do on my old friend the Planning Grid
  3. as an "outline", not unlike the file tree you're used to in Windows, which displays what's written on your index cards in their hierarches, collapsed or expanded as you like. Each document's entry in the outliner has an icon for whether it has a synopsis, and whether there's any actual text in the document, and shows the colour-codings from the meta-data. You can also choose what other meta-data you want to see: I use it to track individual and cumulative word counts, and those pesky dates and ages.

If you're a splurgy-free-writey pantser, you can hide everything else and work on a blank document, typing for as long as you want - think Howl -  and only later "split" it, with a right-click of the mouse or a keyboard shortcut, into separate documents. You can then fill in the meta-data with whatever notes you want, to remind you of what each document is, and start moving things around. And of course you can go on splitting or joining things as you go, if things change.

If you're a pattern-thinker and planner and need to get the structure right first before your imagination can start to run, you can plan and think and brood, moving your index cards or the elements in the outline around until it all works. You can look for the balance of settings or story-threads or points of view, you can see where the gaps are and what you haven't decided yet, and get a feel for the pace and shape of it all.

If, like me, you're a planster, then you don't actually think in terms of either planning or pantsing, but regard everything as a form of imagining-on-paper. Scrivener's brilliant for us, because you can swap between different ways of working all the time. When I'm on a roll and a scene is pouring out of my fingers, I let rip. It goes where it will, and maybe not where I thought. And then I look at it, decide what it is, whether to split it into different documents, and give it the meta-data to suit. Then I can start fitting it into the novel, and fitting the novel to it. In the outliner I can easily find the places where I need to nip back and tweak something in the light of this new stuff.

If you write out-of-order, then you can do that, using separate documents, either planned or pantsed, using the meta-data to keep track of what each one is, and fitting it all together at the end. And Scrivener is good at tracking what you've done so far, and what you haven't.

If you plan a little ahead but not beyond that, then it's just the same: you can work out a clear idea of the next few chapters, and if you do have a idea for something much further ahead, drop an index card in there for now, and know that when you get closer, it'll still be there, and you can build the rest of that stage round it.

If you're revising an existing novel, you can import it into Scrivener, chop it up into sections and label them, and then start moving things around. 

Or if you're re-writing from scratch, but will want some stuff from the old version, you can start and plan a new Scrivener project, and just bring in what you find the new version asks for from the old version.

So, Scrivener works how you work. And, whichever of the three main views you're in,

  • you can choose how much of all the other material you want to have alongside it: you can have or not have a LH side-panel showing the "binder" of all the documents which looks a bit like an outliner, and the collections; you can have or not have a RH side-panel showing all the notes and meta-data.
  • You can make a "Collection" of any set of documents that's useful, without them actually moving from their place in the draft gathering of all the documennts, say, in a certain voice, or all the letters someone writes, or all the scenes with a particular setting. You can then look at them individually one by one, or in a sequence, to get the voice, the plot-mechanics or the details of a setting consistent.
  • You can work with a split screen - two windows, essentially - each showing a different document or set of Scrivenings, or the outliner, or the corkboard with its index cards.
  • There's a full range of WP-type features: fonts and colours and sizes, margins and headers, search and replace, target-setting and measuring, script formatting for different forms and industries, digital and print.
  • As well as normal searching within a document, you can do a search of the whole draft. If you do, Scrivener automatically makes a collection of the documents containing the search term. You can then look at them either singly or in a single Scrivenings sequence, while they in fact stay in their place in the draft. No more tedious leaping about in Word and losing your place. 
  • You can of course also use documents themselves for planning and notes, import all sorts of files including audio, video and images
  • Scrivener constantly saves itself, so computer crashes will never lose more than a minute or two's work - and if you keep the files in your Dropbox, they'll be automatically backed up there, with the last 30 days of versions.

But you can work all that out for yourself, with the free trial they offer. I should say that it does assume that you'll be exporting the whole thing at the end, for final tweaking and formatting in Word or suchlike, and it's not so easy to to-and-fro between them. But it's still so worth it, so I want to finish by suggesting

One way of getting to grips with Scrivener:

First, I'd suggest not starting to learn Scrivener on a brand-new, full-length project. It's like trying to balance on two different gym-balls at once: asking for trouble.

Be patient. It's worth it. If you want to do something in Scrivener because that's how you work, it's worth bothering to try to find out how to do it rather than just sighing and giving up. Literature and Latte, the parent company of Scrivener, has good support and good forums where you can ask for help or for suggestions for a way to do something.

Yes, fiddling with it can also be a way of putting off the actual writing, if you let it. But, hey, we're grown-ups. Go into full-screen, and if you want to keep a picture or synopsis visible then have the little floating panel of this document's meta-data beside it; then get on with writing. With Scrivener you can always do the fiddling later, when you know what fiddling the project actually needs.

Get hold of Scrivener for Dummies. The Scrivener manual itself is a model of its kind - very clear, and also stylishly written. But more help - especially in an actual, paper book - is never a bad thing. Mind you, the Dummies book occasionally fails to highlight the minor differences between Mac and PC versions (I gather the Android/Linux version is on its way), and the minor deficiencies of the PC version. (Not that they're many- I use the PC version, and have found scarcely any lacks. ) But it's still very good.

ETA 12th April 2020: the new Windows version, Scrivener 3, which is in the final stages of beta-testing, will have completely caught up with the Mac version.

Start with a small document; a synopsis, say, and use it to explore how Scrivener works best for you. If you think of each index card as a plot-point you want to put in, each document might only have a sentence, but you'll get used to handling things in Scrivener-y ways. Or splurge your synopsis and then split it into documents with their meta-data, and see how that's expressed in the Outliner or the corkboard. And if you do write a synopsis, you could use the structure you establish as the basis for the actual book-project, too.

Try planning something that you're thinking about vaguely, just to get an idea of how the outliner and the corkboard can work for you. I used it to think about a non-fiction project I'm brooding on, and learnt a lot, because the chain of thinking and connection was easier to think about, and set down. But I've also used it to plan a novel.

Try using it on an existing project. You could import the text of a novel and split it up, with a view to re-working it. Or you could do what I'm doing at the moment, and re-build a novel: I started a new project, and thrashed out a structure for it, with an index card for each thing I knew needed to be there. Now I'm working my way through, writing new stuff, bringing in bits of old stuff where I want them, and moving stuff around without ever getting lost, because any chunk of text has its own labels and identity, which never leaves it.

So that's how Scrivener seems to me. You can download a free trial, which lasts for 30 days, but they can be non-consecutive days, so that's a decent chance to get to know it. And the licence covers installing the software on two machines as long as it's the same operating system. So why not give it a go?

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

sophie

Yay for Scrivener! I'm down to using my husband's work laptop at the moment, which means I can't download packages like that. Scrivener's my main, if not only, reason for wanting a computer of my own. That and having to share with the rest of the family when I want to listen to iPlayer.

I decided to restructure my already-complicated novel into parallel narratives. Without Scrivener I would have been there for months bending my brain to work out how to divide it. With Scrivener chopping it into pieces and labelling index cards with word counts it took me a few days. Novel transformed into something that was almost there. I used the trial version and had no idea how to do anything else, but like you, I'm a complete convert.

I am now working on a second WIP. Knowing there will eventually be Scrivener and I can organise it later, I am finding it easy to write the first draft in longhand- with no care for anything other than discovering the story. As you say it really supports almost any writing process.

Keith Skinner

One feature I've found valuable is inserting a picture into character sketches. I'll find something in Google Images and save it to my computer then insert it into the character sketch. By going to the corkboard view under Characters, I can see all my peeps should I need a visual cue in constructing a scene. The photo also appears (in a smaller image) in the individual sketches.

As for the planning grid, Emma, another author just turned me on to an amazing piece of software called Aeon Timeline. It looks complicated but it's rather easy to construct a coded timeline that ties characters to activities. Written by and for writers, it also includes an arc dimension, so you can see who is doing what within each storyline. It's been really helpful for historical fiction in tracking character activities against actual events. And, as with Scrivener, it's an excellent manuscript avoidance mechanism :)

Paul Lamb

Okay. Okay. I'll try it!

Jo Bailey

It's a fantastic programme Emma! I've just completed Gwen Hernandez' two-week online course (takes around 30 mins a day) which I can highly recommend. She is the author of Scrivener for Dummies.
I wrote my last non-fiction book with my workspace completely covered in research notes, photos, documents etc - for my next project it's such a joy to be able to access all this info within the Scrivener binder instead.
I'm totally sold on the programme and have since downloaded its companion Scapple which is loads of fun when brainstorming project ideas. I believe it is only available on Mac at this stage but the PC version is coming. :)

Sandra Davies

I think I had a go with it a couple of years ago, when trying Script Frenzy, (which failed miserably after two days!) but have just watched the video and think it might make things easier for my next novel - especially having seen how much I needed to organise myself with my curent wip. (I'm the sort that needs to make my own mistakes before taking advice!)
Thanks Emma

Sandra Davies

One question, which I haven't found an answer to - is it possible have character index cards which link to names within the text so that I could, for example, by typing in 'Ben', bring up all the places where Ben is mentioned with attached (and automatically re-ordered) page numbers?

Sandra Davies

Ah ... halfway through the tutorial - ignore this!!

Emma Darwin

Sophie, that complicated kind of re-structuring can get one in such a tizz, and, yes, Scrivener makes it so much easier. I've just put Scrivener on my laptop, so I can work away from home (the project itself living in Dropbox), and the world is my writing-room...

Emma Darwin

LoL Paul!

Emma Darwin

Keith, that's fascinating. I haven't done that yet - don't tend to do a lot with images - but it sounds just the job.

On timelines, yes, I can imagine that would be very useful. So far I've either had a very short, tight timeline, or a longer, looser one where it's less crucial: For the WIP I've just put the date in the title of the index card, and so they're there at my LH in the Binder... But you could, for example, put world events in the synopsis, if they needed tracking, or on a separate index card, just as I use some for other off-stage events - there's nothing to say all the cards have to represent actual text.

Emma Darwin

Thanks for the recommendation, Jo. One possible next project for me is a non-fic thing which I'm rather dreading, from the pov of just organising the material.

Forgetting stuff is a crucial part of my process of fiction, so I'm willing not to be too ruthlessly organised. But non-fic is different!

Emma Darwin

You're welcome, Sandra!

Isn't it odd how little sense advice often makes in the abstract - as you say, it's only when the situation is concrete, in front of you, and in a muddle, that the advice has some reality and applicability...

Geri

Emma,
I tried Scrivener and I am pretty sure I need the Dummies guide. The one thing that really irritated me was that I could not make the screen bigger (i.e., zoom) so that the font looked larger on the screen -- even with my Mac. And, being a little short-sighted, that's a drawback. (Usually I write at 130% of normal).

But you have inspired me to get the Dummies guide -- and maybe Scrivener will read this and provide a zoom feature!

Thanks

Emma Darwin

Geri, I don't know about zooming the overall appearance of the whole program, but you can certainly zoom for the text in documents - I like working at 120% or so, based on a 12pt actual point size, IYSWIM. You can set that as a default in "Options", too. The zoom is down at the bottom of that document window, to the left of where the word and character count is. And if you've got two windows open - the brilliant Split Screen, they zoom independantly.

At a glance I can't see that you can change the sizes of things in the Binder, or the outliner, but you can choose font size for the index cards, to some degree. And in the Document Notes panels and things you can do whatever you like in terms of font.

John in Atlanta

@Geri: You can also click on View and on the dropdown menu click on Customize Toolbar. That opens up several rows of options. In the 5th row the letter A appears, and beneath the first it says Bigger and beneath the second Smaller. Move those to the main toolbar, and click on them to increase font size in the document.

Cheers,
John

Emma Darwin

Thanks for that, John - very useful!

Emma Darwin

In my Windows version, "Customise Toolbar" seems to be in the Tools menu, not View, but then you're in.

In fact, thanks Geri and John for making me get round to investigating it all, and fine-tuning both main and editing toolbars to suit me!

Ainsley

I've finally been convinced (after many tweets from @thesiswhisperer, including one today linking your blog!). I'm keen to know how the program goes exporting and then importing word docs. The reason I ask is, as a PhD student I don't have a permanent desk, I work between a number of computers, and only my home laptop has Scrivener installed.

Emma Darwin

Ainsley, I think you've probably hit on one of its drawbacks (I started trying to mention them in the post, but even I know that a blogpost has to stop somewhere!)

As far as I can see, the traffic is basically one way. Scrivener's intended for drafting, and the idea is that once it's how you want it pretty much, you export it by a process called "compile", into - say - Word, for final tidying up and final formatting. I think it preserves your things like italics, though the first time I did it I think I picked the wrong format to Compile too, and it replaced them all with underlining... Another reason to try first with something short!

The tricky thing is bringing the doc back into Scrivener. Of course you can import a Word document, obviously, but it imports in a lump, as a single document. Great for cannibalising an old piece, which is what I've been using it for. But less good for a day-by-day toing and froing. Unless you have a new Word document for each little doc in your Scrivener setup and do it one by one, it doesn't slot the bits back into their individual places. Does that make sense?

Scrivener will let you have a copy on more than one PC as long as they're yours - I have one on my main desktop, and one on my laptop (I loathe laptops, and only really was persuaded to buy one so I could run Scrivener on it...)

Jessica

Hi Emma, I was just wondering if you've experimented with yWriter at all? If so, how does it compare with your experience of Scrivener? I'm debating which to adopt...

Emma Darwin

Jessica, I haven't I'm afraid. All I really know is that I've never met a professional, published writer who used anything except Scrivener, and then Word. (The playwrights and screenwriters use Final Draft, but that's different...)

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)